The Business Dictionary defines Web Personalisation as “Tailoring the presentation of a website’s content to match a specific user’s instructions or preferences. This custom tailoring is accomplished either by the user choosing from a menu of available alternatives or by tracking his or her behavior (such as which pages are accessed and how often) on the site.”
One of the most noted examples of web personalisation is by e-commerce giant Amazon. Amazon uses item to item collaborative filtering to match items a customer has purchased to similar items, and then compiles it into a ‘Recommendation List’. Undoubtably this practice has revolutionised the e-commerce industry, but there is two sides to every coin. Below I will compare and contrast the positives and negatives of the system, and conclude whether or not personalisation is something we can benefit from.
There are 3 obvious advantages to web personalisation, it saves time. It cuts out needlessly repetitive tasks, such as typing in personal details each time you wish to make a purchase. However, to counteract that positive, some users may prefer Anonymity. Although it undoubtably saves time, the idea of having very personal details stored by a company can be daunting. It is really down to the individual at hand and whether or not they are comfortable with this. This calls into question security issues, and whether personal details are infact kept private. How a company deals with information it is given can have a major impact on it’s reputation and relationship with customers.
A second positive for personalisation is that it saves money. The cutting out of needless repetitve tasks, essentially cuts out the middle man. In the case of Amazon, it homes in on what the user wants and recognises. It doesn’t suggest completely random unrelated items, it knows your interests and what you like, based on things you have previously purchased. This encourages people to spend more. So not only can personalisation save money, but also makes money by bringing items you want, straight to you.
This system works very well for Amazon, because it is in itself, an established company, with a good reputation. Customers are not given a reason for not trusting them. Unfortunately this does not work as well for newer, smaller companies. People can be more reluctant to trust a name they do not know, and so personalisation can actually backfire. Again, it all depends on just how comfortable each different individual person with sharing their personal details online.
The third positive is that it provides better information. Personalisation serves to eliminate pointless irrelevant information, it focuses on interests and products it knows a specific customer is interested in. On the negative side, in some cases, a person may not want their tracks to be stored, wether the items they have purchased are a surprise gift, or something they should not be purchasing at all, illegal goods or otherwise.
Personally, I am for web Personalisation. I myself am comfortable divulging my personal details to websites I trust. It makes my internet experience, not only faster, but easier. I appreciate the cutting out of boring repetitive tasks, I don’t particularly enjoy having to type my name or address into a box one hundred times a day. So for personalisation I am thankful. Yes, there are down sides, as highlighted above, but each positive and negative are based on an individuals own feelings towards personalisation. There is no right and wrong answer, to wether web personalisation is good or bad. It is there for you to use if you so wish.







